|
Post by Soccerhouse on Aug 16, 2018 11:41:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Soccerhouse on Aug 16, 2018 14:56:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by zizou on Aug 16, 2018 18:34:32 GMT -5
This straddles line between coaching education and P2P.
|
|
|
Post by Soccerhouse on Aug 17, 2018 13:05:30 GMT -5
another good one:
If you haven't read the article yet, I highly recommend you do!
|
|
|
Post by oraclesfriend on Aug 17, 2018 13:31:09 GMT -5
So the anti-Rondo thing...both my daughters have coaches with A level licenses and both use rondo to an extent. They use it mostly the way I see pros using it as a warmup. 4v1 or 5v2. They are not using it as my older daughter's old coach did as a 10v2 for the whole practice. I see the benefit of 4v1 and 5v2 etc. I got a little sidetracked about my point here...which was that A licensed coaches are using rondo despite what the USSF is saying.
|
|
|
Post by oraclesfriend on Aug 17, 2018 13:35:39 GMT -5
About the article itself...I found them out of touch with reality, but it did not make me as angry as some of these people posting on Twitter. I did see a lot of comments that were frustrating, but I guess I am wondering how the clubs and the players/parents can get their point across to the powers that be. It reminds me of government as a whole...out of touch and with no clear cut method of getting back in touch.
|
|
|
Post by atlfutboldad on Aug 17, 2018 14:05:49 GMT -5
Rondo is great, it teaches quick reaction and decision making. A whole practice it does not make.
|
|
|
Post by rifle on Aug 17, 2018 20:02:18 GMT -5
Par for the course. Control is the priority
|
|
|
Post by zizou on Aug 18, 2018 9:54:22 GMT -5
And it continues. The Fed sure is working to improve soccer education and quality in the USA.
|
|