|
Post by SoccerMom on Oct 22, 2015 15:54:15 GMT -5
Plus, I am excited that US Soccer is addressing the more important idea of requiring small sided games. Well some age groups are going from 3v3 to 4v4, some are going from 6v6 to 7v7 and some are going from 8v8 to 9v9. So we'll still have small sided games but they will be less small than current. Add to that the increased roster size and the decrease in game length in some age groups and you have less touches and more bench sitters. Plus with the new calendar year grouping, you'll be bench-sitting with kids you don't know.
Next up on the agenda: metric field sizes.
LOL I think its maximum roster size, I dont see clubs rostering that many kids in the younger age groups
|
|
|
Post by Soccerhouse on Oct 22, 2015 15:57:22 GMT -5
I still think with switch to 7v7, optimal roster size would be 10 for 9v9, i would say optimal roster size is 12, 13 max.
|
|
|
Post by soccerdadinga on Oct 22, 2015 18:32:29 GMT -5
I actually had not thought about the particulars of what they were describing in terms of field size and kids on the field. I'd have to think about it, but it seems like that they want to have even numbers of field players?
|
|