|
Post by keepitreal on Sept 5, 2020 21:58:18 GMT -5
Please give club scores
U13 Concorde Platinum 6 U13 Concorde Premier 0
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Sept 5, 2020 22:37:07 GMT -5
Kind of disappointing that ECNL hasn’t fixed their system yet, or even posted a stopgap basic spreadsheet with scores - they don’t even have half their conferences going yet. And somehow even the TraceBot can deliver entire game video with individual player highlights and stats on the same day or following day. C’mon, man!
|
|
|
Post by therussian on Sept 6, 2020 5:18:22 GMT -5
U15 C.F. Platinum 1 - C.F. Premier 1
|
|
|
Post by thisonedude on Sept 6, 2020 7:36:21 GMT -5
Kind of disappointing that ECNL hasn’t fixed their system yet, or even posted a stopgap basic spreadsheet with scores - they don’t even have half their conferences going yet. And somehow even the TraceBot can deliver entire game video with individual player highlights and stats on the same day or following day. C’mon, man! ECNL online schedule still differs from the schedule my friend’s son has from his team. Dates, times, and even opponents are different. I assume there may still be some fluidity with which teams are/are able to participate.
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Sept 6, 2020 8:32:47 GMT -5
It’s definitely the Wild West this season, but it’s easy to input changes and scores when tech is solid and vendors/users competent. Our TM is frustrated with the league not getting the situation resolved yet.
|
|
|
Post by bogan on Sept 6, 2020 8:42:52 GMT -5
It’s definitely the Wild West this season, but it’s easy to input changes and scores when tech is solid and vendors/users competent. Our TM is frustrated with the league not getting the situation resolved yet. True-it’s not rocket surgery or anything.
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Sept 6, 2020 13:21:13 GMT -5
9/5: NASA swept Alabama 08s 4-0 07s 5-1 06s 3-2 05s 3-1 04s 5-1 02/03s 4-2
UFA 07s 6-3 Chattanooga CF 07s 1-1 AFU 05s 1-2 Tennessee SC
9/6: NASA 05s 6-0 Tennessee SC
|
|
|
Post by areyousure on Sept 6, 2020 14:05:25 GMT -5
9/5 02/03 Ufa 1 - Chattanooga 0 02/03 GSA 2 - Alliance 0
9/6 02/03 Ufa 7 - Alliance 3
|
|
|
Post by thisonedude on Sept 6, 2020 14:32:32 GMT -5
Any 04 Boys scores?
|
|
|
Post by jkdub1 on Sept 6, 2020 15:23:29 GMT -5
Chattanooga 1-2 UFA Saturday Chattanooga 1-6 GSA Sunday
|
|
|
Post by jkdub1 on Sept 6, 2020 15:25:50 GMT -5
U16 Chattanooga 0-5 UFA Chattanooga 5-2 GSA
|
|
|
Post by OTPSoccer on Sept 6, 2020 17:58:38 GMT -5
Boys 2006 Scores
Saturday GSA 3, FC Alliance 2 CF Platinum 1, CF Premier 1 NASA 3, Alabama FC 2 Tennessee FC 2, AFU 1 UFA vs Chattanooga [tbd]
Sunday AFU 0, Alabama FC 0 NASA 3, Tennessee FC 0 GSA vs Chattanooga [tbd] UFA vs FC Alliance [tbd]
|
|
|
Post by thisonedude on Sept 6, 2020 19:16:35 GMT -5
Chattanooga 1-2 UFA Saturday Chattanooga 1-6 GSA Sunday Thanks! Looks like C’nooga had a bad weekend. I’m sure they’ll bounce back.
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Sept 6, 2020 19:42:27 GMT -5
9/6: NASA vs Tennessee SC 08s 1-3 07s 3-3 06s 3-0 05s 6-0 04s 2-1 02/03s 0-2
|
|
|
Post by keepitreal on Sept 6, 2020 22:39:47 GMT -5
What about 08 ufa v fc alliance 08 nasa v fc alliance
|
|
|
Post by blu on Sept 7, 2020 7:58:42 GMT -5
Based on a FB post it looks like GSA swept FC Alliance on Sat (all ages).
|
|
|
Post by keepitreal on Sept 7, 2020 11:05:50 GMT -5
what was score?
|
|
|
Post by atlsoccerdad on Sept 7, 2020 15:52:51 GMT -5
UFA 04 2 - 1 Chattanooga UFA 04 5 - 0 FC Alliance
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Sept 8, 2020 9:54:14 GMT -5
OMG! Some ECNL scores are starting to trickle out on their app & website.
|
|
|
Post by ecnlquestions on Oct 4, 2020 18:12:29 GMT -5
Any scores from this weekend?
|
|
|
Post by Soccerhouse on Oct 4, 2020 18:37:20 GMT -5
The app reminds me of 1998 and dial up 28.8 modems.....
Painful.
|
|
|
Post by Brinker on Oct 10, 2020 19:29:50 GMT -5
NASA 07s have beaten a previously undefeated UFA U14 ECNL team.
|
|
|
Post by secretecnlhuman on Oct 10, 2020 20:49:50 GMT -5
Not sure the result- but standings confirm 3-0 for nasa’s 07s.
Side note - saw they played at Kings Ridge
Youth high level games should not be played there. That field is embarrassing narrow. Might be fine for 13s and 14s, but 15+ -field is way to narrow for good soccer.
|
|
|
Post by Brinker on Oct 10, 2020 21:15:51 GMT -5
Not sure the result- but standings confirm 3-0 for nasa’s 07s. Side note - saw they played at Kings Ridge Youth high level games should not be played there. That field is embarrassing narrow. Might be fine for 13s and 14s, but 15+ -field is way to narrow for good soccer. They used the big football stadium. Turf needed due to rain.
|
|
|
Post by atlsoccerdad on Oct 11, 2020 16:00:31 GMT -5
Even the Kings Ridge turf couldn't prevent the 7:00 pm game getting "ended early" last night during the the mini hurricane.
The turf started to puddle and the through balls stopped dead in the water.
|
|
|
Post by georgiatechalum on Oct 11, 2020 18:56:36 GMT -5
UFA (U13) 08’s won both their games this weekend, and I heard LSA - U13( MLS) beat U13 Atlanta United 3-2. Coach JJ must have those boys playing good soccer.
|
|
|
Post by boysinaction on Oct 11, 2020 19:37:30 GMT -5
UFA (U13) 08’s won both their games this weekend, and I heard LSA - U13( MLS) beat U13 Atlanta United 3-2. Coach JJ must have those boys playing good soccer. LSA U13s beat AU U13s 3-2. They did what they needed to do, capitalized on a few mistakes, and never trailed in the game. As for whether or not they played good soccer is debatable. AU probably possessed the ball 75% of the game, but seemed afraid to shoot the ball. The LSA kids played hard and earned the W. It should serve as a wake up call to the AU kids.
|
|
|
Post by georgiatechalum on Oct 11, 2020 20:45:21 GMT -5
My intent was more to provide UFA scores, and I threw in a bonus score I will take your word for it on time of possession since I did not watch the game but sounds like you did and your boy plays for AU - I think that is a great accomplishment for him. You should be very proud. I am constantly seeing folks on the forum call out AU and I really do not understand that. The kids are obviously talented and I’d bet most boys/ parents would jump at the chance to play for AU. What an experience it must be. ( not to say some kids have not passed on the opportunity- as I know some have ) I also think that for the MLS Next league to survive the competition must be worthy. So I would think parents that are fans of youth soccer would be supported of teams trying to compete. I believe the LSA team has been cobbled together and they have been playing together since August vs an AU team that has the best of the best and have been playing together for at least 12-18 months. Let’s encourage vs break down others as what seemed like bitter ‘ got lucky ‘ type of post. i.e “ played well is debatable”. They clearly played well enough unless time of possession is now what matters. 🤔
|
|
|
Post by Keeper on Oct 11, 2020 20:53:05 GMT -5
UFA (U13) 08’s won both their games this weekend, and I heard LSA - U13( MLS) beat U13 Atlanta United 3-2. Coach JJ must have those boys playing good soccer. LSA U13s beat AU U13s 3-2. They did what they needed to do, capitalized on a few mistakes, and never trailed in the game. As for whether or not they played good soccer is debatable. AU probably possessed the ball 75% of the game, but seemed afraid to shoot the ball. The LSA kids played hard and earned the W. It should serve as a wake up call to the AU kids. Is this MLS game/schedule out?? How is that Lanier group doing so far?
|
|
|
Post by Futsal Gawdess on Oct 11, 2020 21:01:16 GMT -5
Is this MLS game/schedule out?? How is that Lanier group doing so far? I hear MLS is taking a drip-drip approach and only releasing the schedule 3-4 weeks at a time in case they have to make changes due to Covid. Also, like with DA in the earlier age-groups, scores for the 13s and 14s are intentionally hidden and are not being publicly published... system.gotsport.com/org_event/events/1271
|
|