Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 7:47:23 GMT -5
So another million dollar question for coaches.
at what age do you really make fitness a priority at your practice sessions? We have a coach at our club, that is running u12s to death. I'm honestly not sure how long these types of sessions will occur, but my greatest fear is that kids walk away because its no longer fun. Its not easy, long day of school, get dehydrated at school from not drinking enough water, than show up at practice and have to run your tail off. Maybe its just a pre-season thing, but if you can't play soccer it doesn't matter how much you can run!
Too be honest, that was one of the reasons I lost interest and didn't want to play in college. their was such a premium put on fitness, coaches were obsessed with running 2 in 12 vs how you performed on the field. We aren't track stars we are soccer players. Their is a big difference in getting fitness during drills with certain sprints etc, but running hills and on a track is a different ball game. yes, i know soccer players need to be fit, but the point i'm making is we were. we all ran on our own, ran together as a team on weekends etc. Sometimes i wonder if its just a coach being lazy, because they don't want to put together an entire hour and half session.
sorry if this comes across whiny, but we are talking about a normal u12 top team, a group of 11 year olds. a normal fit 11 year old that trains hard 3 days a week can run all day without the olympic style training regiment.
|
|
|
Post by spectator on Aug 26, 2014 8:40:02 GMT -5
Tagging onto this - at what point does a coach make the fitness the responsibility of the player entirely? Our coach put it back on the girls - saying they are U15 - Athena A - they know what they need to do to stay in shape and he doesn't want to use valuable practice time doing what they can do on their own. I agree BUT - what do you do with the kids who lack that self motivation? It hurts the whole team if a quarter of the players are gassed midway through the first half of a fast paced game.
Running 11 year olds more than 5-10 minutes of a practice for conditioning is too much in my opinion. At Academy it's more on skills and then selecting players with skills and the right level of fitness - but without burning the younger ones out too early. Plus intense distance running is not good for growing kids - you'll see knee and ankle issues if not done properly
|
|
|
Post by soccerfan30 on Aug 26, 2014 11:30:17 GMT -5
As a coach I'm of the belief that fitness should be incorporated with the ball, if the sessions are set up properly and the level is kept high throughout the players will improve their aerobic and anaerobic fitness base. Obviously there will be some occasional down time when going over tactics, positions, formations, etc but over the course of 90 minutes to two hours for a session the players should be getting what they need. Nothing makes me cringe more than a coach running players for an hour, doing hills, etc all the time but neglect the technical aspects. At our club we have a certified strength and conditioning coach that teams can go to once a week where they do more fitness oriented work: beep test, ladders, parachutes, hurdles, agility and such.
|
|