|
Post by dreamsoccer on Jan 10, 2024 17:48:33 GMT -5
I know Coaching plays a part in it. The better Coaches seem to be with Platinum or is it the better players make better Coaches?
|
|
|
Post by DunwoodySoccerDad on Jan 10, 2024 21:04:55 GMT -5
I know Coaching plays a part in it. The better Coaches seem to be with Platinum or is it the better players make better Coaches? I assume you’re referring to ECNL, not ECRL. For ECNL girls, the Platinum team is their top team so the Platinum coach gets to choose his or her players before Premier. I’m guessing both teams at each age group have quality coaches so for the most part it comes down to having the best players, that’s why Platinum is always the better team. For ECRL girls, it’s a different dynamic since Platinum is based out of their Central location and Premier is based out of their Columbus location. So sometimes ECRL Premier is the better team.
|
|
|
Post by Topline Soccer on Jan 10, 2024 21:15:32 GMT -5
It's like the difference between Junior Varsity and Varsity at a high school. Varsity roster is picked first then JV. Sure JV team can beat the Varsity team sometimes at a practice scrimmage (JV try their absolute hardest and Varsity takes it with normal intensity). However, when the lights are on and the pressure is on the Varsity team will win 90% of the time. Regardless of who is coaching. Speed, strength, technical skill and experience of winning games takes over.
An alternative question is, should players be moving up and down during the season based of performance? Some Premiere players should move up if they are playing well and be rewarded for it. Any players not doing their best on Platinum should go down.
|
|
|
Post by atlantagray on Jan 10, 2024 22:57:31 GMT -5
I know Coaching plays a part in it. The better Coaches seem to be with Platinum or is it the better players make better Coaches? I assume you’re referring to ECNL, not ECRL. For ECNL girls, the Platinum team is their top team so the Platinum coach gets to choose his or her players before Premier. I’m guessing both teams at each age group have quality coaches so for the most part it comes down to having the best players, that’s why Platinum is always the better team. For ECRL girls, it’s a different dynamic since Platinum is based out of their Central location and Premier is based out of their Columbus location. So sometimes ECRL Premier is the better team. Note that the 2011 premiere team is based out of Columbus. But that's the only age group I'm aware of that doesn't have both platinum and premiere out of Atlanta
|
|
|
Post by youthsoccerdad on Jan 11, 2024 7:46:30 GMT -5
It's like the difference between Junior Varsity and Varsity at a high school. Varsity roster is picked first then JV. Sure JV team can beat the Varsity team sometimes at a practice scrimmage (JV try their absolute hardest and Varsity takes it with normal intensity). However, when the lights are on and the pressure is on the Varsity team will win 90% of the time. Regardless of who is coaching. Speed, strength, technical skill and experience of winning games takes over. An alternative question is, should players be moving up and down during the season based of performance? Some Premiere players should move up if they are playing well and be rewarded for it. Any players not doing their best on Platinum should go down. Partially accurate. Platinum picks first, is the top team. But depending on where the team is located, platinum doesn't necessarily have access to the top players. The example someone else used was Columbus, I think a better example would be if the team played out of Concord West for example. You would have kids that select that location (Premier) over Central to avoid 4 hour practice/commute days. You could go a whole level deeper and think about it more as teams where NASA ECNL (a central location) competes for top players against Central and West more than Central and West compete against each other (it is important to note when I mean top, I mean top players not just a kid on ECNL or RL, I mean the kid that makes those teams special). I wasn't a big fan of the high school is analogy, since Varsity versus JV you are talking about a huge age difference in kids (not even getting into skill level) where the Varsity would win 20-0. I don't think the gap is anywhere as close to that big between most platinum and premier teams I am familiar with.
|
|
|
Post by bolo on Jan 11, 2024 9:55:11 GMT -5
I know Coaching plays a part in it. The better Coaches seem to be with Platinum or is it the better players make better Coaches? I assume you’re referring to ECNL, not ECRL. For ECNL girls, the Platinum team is their top team so the Platinum coach gets to choose his or her players before Premier. I’m guessing both teams at each age group have quality coaches so for the most part it comes down to having the best players, that’s why Platinum is always the better team. For ECRL girls, it’s a different dynamic since Platinum is based out of their Central location and Premier is based out of their Columbus location. So sometimes ECRL Premier is the better team. Interesting to see that in the 2008 Girls age group, Premier actually finished the fall in 1st place, ahead of Platinum. But that seems to be a major anomaly. In every other age group, Platinum is at or near the top of the standings, while Premier is mid-to-bottom of the table. theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx
|
|
|
Post by Keeper on Jan 11, 2024 11:14:20 GMT -5
I assume you’re referring to ECNL, not ECRL. For ECNL girls, the Platinum team is their top team so the Platinum coach gets to choose his or her players before Premier. I’m guessing both teams at each age group have quality coaches so for the most part it comes down to having the best players, that’s why Platinum is always the better team. For ECRL girls, it’s a different dynamic since Platinum is based out of their Central location and Premier is based out of their Columbus location. So sometimes ECRL Premier is the better team. Interesting to see that in the 2008 Girls age group, Premier actually finished the fall in 1st place, ahead of Platinum. But that seems to be a major anomaly. In every other age group, Platinum is at or near the top of the standings, while Premier is mid-to-bottom of the table. theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspxInteresting as well is that 08 ECNL Premier team is coached by GB the owner of concorde.
|
|
|
Post by DunwoodySoccerDad on Jan 11, 2024 11:50:36 GMT -5
Interesting to see that in the 2008 Girls age group, Premier actually finished the fall in 1st place, ahead of Platinum. But that seems to be a major anomaly. In every other age group, Platinum is at or near the top of the standings, while Premier is mid-to-bottom of the table. theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspxInteresting as well is that 08 ECNL Premier team is coached by GB the owner of concorde. They finished 1 & 2 in the standings, played each other once to a 2-2 draw. Sounds like they just have a lot of depth and talent in that particular age group.
|
|
|
Post by hometeamsoccer on Jan 12, 2024 9:02:27 GMT -5
I know Coaching plays a part in it. The better Coaches seem to be with Platinum or is it the better players make better Coaches? I assume you’re referring to ECNL, not ECRL. For ECNL girls, the Platinum team is their top team so the Platinum coach gets to choose his or her players before Premier. I’m guessing both teams at each age group have quality coaches so for the most part it comes down to having the best players, that’s why Platinum is always the better team. For ECRL girls, it’s a different dynamic since Platinum is based out of their Central location and Premier is based out of their Columbus location. So sometimes ECRL Premier is the better team. This has been true in the past but the ECNL 2011 premier team is based out of Columbus this year and the ECRL premier team is based out of Atlanta. I've heard the 2012 ECNL premier team is also supposed to be based from Columbus. So, while the best players for the older age groups ECNL 2010 and above were always picked by coaches to be placed first on platinum first then premier, this isn't likely to hold true once you get from 2011 and down. The Atlanta location obviously has a bigger player pool to pick from for the ECNL platinum team, but there will likely be girls on the ECNL premier team now, who in past years might have traveled to Atlanta and would have been added to the general player pool and picked in the fashion you described.
|
|
|
Post by bolo on Jan 12, 2024 13:40:10 GMT -5
Interesting to see that in the 2008 Girls age group, Premier actually finished the fall in 1st place, ahead of Platinum. But that seems to be a major anomaly. In every other age group, Platinum is at or near the top of the standings, while Premier is mid-to-bottom of the table. theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspxInteresting as well is that 08 ECNL Premier team is coached by GB the owner of concorde. He probably holds some players back that could/would otherwise be on Platinum to boost up his own team. And if you're the Platinum coach, I guess you can't complain too loudly- he's your boss!
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Jan 12, 2024 14:58:15 GMT -5
Players can’t move between ECNL Platinum and Premier because they’re in the same league. At some age groups ECNL Platinum coaches might convince a player or two that didn’t make their team to play on the ECRL Platinum team so they can move to ECNL Platinum if needed but that’s rare.
|
|
|
Post by alphabetleague on Jan 12, 2024 22:13:03 GMT -5
Players can’t move between ECNL Platinum and Premier because they’re in the same league. At some age groups ECNL Platinum coaches might convince a player or two that didn’t make their team to play on the ECRL Platinum team so they can move to ECNL Platinum if needed but that’s rare. Not uncommon on the boys side. Honestly it was one ECNL coach who’d drop 2-3 players every yr to ECNL RL Plat. But he’d allow them to train with his team. They’d miss our practices opting for theirs. A few had “I’m better than this team” attitudes and put in little effort. Barely showed up to games… but they’d get moved right back up the next yr. I guess they used all their energy/effort at the ECNL practices.
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Jan 13, 2024 1:52:02 GMT -5
Players can’t move between ECNL Platinum and Premier because they’re in the same league. At some age groups ECNL Platinum coaches might convince a player or two that didn’t make their team to play on the ECRL Platinum team so they can move to ECNL Platinum if needed but that’s rare. Not uncommon on the boys side. Honestly it was one ECNL coach who’d drop 2-3 players every yr to ECNL RL Plat. But he’d allow them to train with his team. They’d miss our practices opting for theirs. A few had “I’m better than this team” attitudes and put in little effort. Barely showed up to games… but they’d get moved right back up the next yr. I guess they used all their energy/effort at the ECNL practices. That’s also why you might find the number 2 keeper at an age group playing on the CF Plat ECRL team which allows both the 1 & 2 keepers to maximize playing time while the first team only has to roster 1 keeper.
|
|
|
Post by Keeper on Jan 15, 2024 10:28:49 GMT -5
Players can’t move between ECNL Platinum and Premier because they’re in the same league. At some age groups ECNL Platinum coaches might convince a player or two that didn’t make their team to play on the ECRL Platinum team so they can move to ECNL Platinum if needed but that’s rare. This is actually wrong now. Players can move between Premier and Platinum now, and did so quite a bit on the Girls side.
|
|
|
Post by atlantagray on Jan 15, 2024 12:29:29 GMT -5
Players can’t move between ECNL Platinum and Premier because they’re in the same league. At some age groups ECNL Platinum coaches might convince a player or two that didn’t make their team to play on the ECRL Platinum team so they can move to ECNL Platinum if needed but that’s rare. This is actually wrong now. Players can move between Premier and Platinum now, and did so quite a bit on the Girls side. How is this allowed (given the bolded section below?) Granted, ECNL rules say the commissioner can grant ECNL to ECNL transfers and the commissioner seemingly has wide discretion to do so (I have pasted that section below as well.) But, it's curious that cf is doing this in season (ie during ECNL play.) 2.2.3 Restrictions on Program Movement Within League Competition. Subject to the Transfer Regulations below, players may not play in multiple programs within any individual ECNL Competition. For clarification: (i) if a club has
multiple programs in ECNL Club Competition, a player may only play on one
program in ECNL Club Competition; and (ii) if a club has multiple programs in an ECNL Regional League, a player may only play on one program in each ECNL Regional League 3.14 Player Transfers. 3.14.1 Base Rule. An ECNL Registered Player may not play for more than one club in ECNL Competitions during the ECNL Season, unless: (i) the new club has an available spot on an ECNL Roster; and (ii) the ECNL Commissioner consents to such
transfer in writing. The consent of the ECNL Commissioner shall be granted at the
ECNL Commissioners’ discretion, and will consider, without limitation, the following
factors: (i) whether a geographic move by the ECNL Player has occurred; (ii) how many games the ECNL Player has participated in; (iii) what time of the ECNL Season the transfer request is made; (iv) the positions of the ECNL Clubs involved; and (v) other factors surrounding the request. The ECNL Commissioner shall review the facts and circumstances surrounding the transfer request based upon the best interests of the player and the league, and shall independently determine whether the transfer shall be approved or denied, and if so whether any additional suspension or conditions shall be imposed on the transfer. A player transferred shall be referred to as a “Transferred Player.” In all situations, the ECNL Commissioner may: (i) refuse a transfer, (ii) grant a transfer and impose a suspension or sanction, or (iii) grant a transfer with no suspension or sanction, all based on the ECNL Commissioner’s review of the facts and circumstances and at the ECNL Commissioner’s discretion. A Transferred Player shall be removed from the ECNL Roster(s) of the “former” club.
|
|
|
Post by GameOfThrow-ins on Jan 15, 2024 19:46:57 GMT -5
Players can’t move between ECNL Platinum and Premier because they’re in the same league. At some age groups ECNL Platinum coaches might convince a player or two that didn’t make their team to play on the ECRL Platinum team so they can move to ECNL Platinum if needed but that’s rare. This is actually wrong now. Players can move between Premier and Platinum now, and did so quite a bit on the Girls side. It looks like there are several checks in place to make sure the transfer is needed. Otherwise if Premier is playing NASA and Platinum is playing FC Alliance then CF could just swap out most of each team with each other to give both the best chance to win. Certainly that would be a competitive advantage that wouldn’t be allowed and what my point was.
|
|
|
Post by fanatic21 on Jan 15, 2024 23:00:54 GMT -5
Players can’t move between ECNL Platinum and Premier because they’re in the same league. At some age groups ECNL Platinum coaches might convince a player or two that didn’t make their team to play on the ECRL Platinum team so they can move to ECNL Platinum if needed but that’s rare. This is actually wrong now. Players can move between Premier and Platinum now, and did so quite a bit on the Girls side. I have daughters who play ENCL for CF and have for several years and I've never heard of Platinum players playing with Premier or vice-versa. Not saying it has never happened in other age groups (but I'd be very surprised if it had), but definitely not in my daughters' age groups.
|
|
|
Post by futbolhero on Jan 16, 2024 8:14:04 GMT -5
It is a very weird dynamic. There are some age groups that platinum RL is stronger than premier ECNL. The existence of two teams at Concorde is definitely a topic that has been discussed many times as it relates to removing one of the ECNL teams. This would spread the talent out amongst other clubs and strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole.
|
|
|
Post by atlantagray on Jan 16, 2024 10:56:42 GMT -5
It is a very weird dynamic. There are some age groups that platinum RL is stronger than premier ECNL. The existence of two teams at Concorde is definitely a topic that has been discussed many times as it relates to removing one of the ECNL teams. This would spread the talent out amongst other clubs and strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole. In removing one ECNL team from CF, while it would strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole, it would also remove a ton of money from their bottom line. So, in true youth soccer fashion, it will never voluntarily happen.
|
|
|
Post by soccerlegacy on Jan 17, 2024 21:18:47 GMT -5
It is a very weird dynamic. There are some age groups that platinum RL is stronger than premier ECNL. The existence of two teams at Concorde is definitely a topic that has been discussed many times as it relates to removing one of the ECNL teams. This would spread the talent out amongst other clubs and strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole. In removing one ECNL team from CF, while it would strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole, it would also remove a ton of money from their bottom line. So, in true youth soccer fashion, it will never voluntarily happen. How does it strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole? Not following the logic here. Maybe it's how we define the situation??
|
|
|
Post by futbolhero on Jan 17, 2024 22:03:40 GMT -5
In removing one ECNL team from CF, while it would strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole, it would also remove a ton of money from their bottom line. So, in true youth soccer fashion, it will never voluntarily happen. How does it strengthen Georgia soccer as a whole? Not following the logic here. Maybe it's how we define the situation?? The stronger players would go to the other local teams and make them better. In turn when on the national level at showcases or nationals they would potentially perform better therefore giving the state a better showing.
|
|
|
Post by youthsoccerdad on Jan 18, 2024 5:13:04 GMT -5
I will be a contrarian. It is not as if the stronger players can just go to another local team, how are they going to make it to practice? Do you think a kid being in a carpool with practice four hours a night four nights a week is reasonable? Atlanta traffic sucks. Even if some kid was willing to do that we as adults should encourage them not to unless they are driving to ATL UTD or getting looks from the national team, and even then...
They should add an ECNL/RL team in the Roswell / Woodstock area. Last year 3 of the 4 teams that played in the Georgia State Playoffs came from this area. A lot of talent in that area are stuck if they can't make NASA ECNL and/or if Concord West doesn't have an ECNL/RL team in their age group, which has a cascading effect through all levels. The only option is to drive, some kids on the east side of 400 can drive to AFU, some kids on the west side of 75 can drive to SSA, some kids make the drive north to UFA, and most kids make the hike to central. All of those options though suck for those kids as they are long drives. The kids that are left settle. If you look at this year or past years, it is why you get anomalous teams from this area - a few years ago SCCL was placed in a tournament with ECNL teams and got a couple of ties and a win, or this past season a 4th place SCCL team last year (spring 2023) with no roster changes ties an ECNL team in a tournament (fall 2023), or a SCCL team beating an ECRL team (fall 2023), those are just a few of the random games I am aware of, I am sure the list goes on and on.
I would add, that I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion. I think what we all know if you have had a child playing at a high level here in ATL, the thing you notice the most is speed of play and technical ability, I would add after that intensity. The more kids you have playing at that level, then have the best kids from those teams get recruited to a NASA or Concord Plat.
|
|
|
Post by atlantagray on Jan 18, 2024 8:08:24 GMT -5
I will be a contrarian. It is not as if the stronger players can just go to another local team, how are they going to make it to practice? Do you think a kid being in a carpool with practice four hours a night four nights a week is reasonable? Atlanta traffic sucks. Even if some kid was willing to do that we as adults should encourage them not to unless they are driving to ATL UTD or getting looks from the national team, and even then... They should add an ECNL/RL team in the Roswell / Woodstock area. Last year 3 of the 4 teams that played in the Georgia State Playoffs came from this area. A lot of talent in that area are stuck if they can't make NASA ECNL and/or if Concord West doesn't have an ECNL/RL team in their age group, which has a cascading effect through all levels. The only option is to drive, some kids on the east side of 400 can drive to AFU, some kids on the west side of 75 can drive to SSA, some kids make the drive north to UFA, and most kids make the hike to central. All of those options though suck for those kids as they are long drives. The kids that are left settle. If you look at this year or past years, it is why you get anomalous teams from this area - a few years ago SCCL was placed in a tournament with ECNL teams and got a couple of ties and a win, or this past season a 4th place SCCL team last year (spring 2023) with no roster changes ties an ECNL team in a tournament (fall 2023), or a SCCL team beating an ECRL team (fall 2023), those are just a few of the random games I am aware of, I am sure the list goes on and on. I would add, that I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion. I think what we all know if you have had a child playing at a high level here in ATL, the thing you notice the most is speed of play and technical ability, I would add after that intensity. The more kids you have playing at that level, then have the best kids from those teams get recruited to a NASA or Concord Plat. I agree with your points on driving kids hours vs the pay offs and the toll that takes on parents and kids alike. And it's also good to note, as you did, that some SCCL/ECRL teams at some age levels sometimes beat an ECNL or GAL team. What I categorically disagree with is your last statement. "... I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion"
Metro Atlanta youth soccer needs contraction and not expansion. This is specific to top level youth soccer and I'm probably speaking more towards the girls' side than the boys' side (and SCCL/ECRL is not top level youth soccer.) You can see this borne out in the fact that southern teams don't perform as well nationally compared to other regions, and this is singularly a product of lack of depth. It's very common for teams from our region to crush everyone regionally but struggle nationally (ie vs west coast teams.) As a basic example, if you have 10 - 12 ECNL/GAL clubs in Atlanta, and each team has say, maybe, 3 or 4 elite players, if you you contract those teams down to 8 teams, you would be increasing depth by adding multiple elite players to those 8 remaining teams (with the other non-elite players moving to ECRL,SCCL, etc with cascading effect through lower teams.) With expansion you would be removing those elite players and spreading them out to other teams, thus decreasing depth at the top level, while at the same time bringing up ECRL and SCCL players into an expanded top league and diluting the depth. So the expanded top league teams would have an even more difficult time competing nationally.
|
|
|
Post by youthsoccerdad on Jan 18, 2024 8:52:49 GMT -5
I will be a contrarian. It is not as if the stronger players can just go to another local team, how are they going to make it to practice? Do you think a kid being in a carpool with practice four hours a night four nights a week is reasonable? Atlanta traffic sucks. Even if some kid was willing to do that we as adults should encourage them not to unless they are driving to ATL UTD or getting looks from the national team, and even then... They should add an ECNL/RL team in the Roswell / Woodstock area. Last year 3 of the 4 teams that played in the Georgia State Playoffs came from this area. A lot of talent in that area are stuck if they can't make NASA ECNL and/or if Concord West doesn't have an ECNL/RL team in their age group, which has a cascading effect through all levels. The only option is to drive, some kids on the east side of 400 can drive to AFU, some kids on the west side of 75 can drive to SSA, some kids make the drive north to UFA, and most kids make the hike to central. All of those options though suck for those kids as they are long drives. The kids that are left settle. If you look at this year or past years, it is why you get anomalous teams from this area - a few years ago SCCL was placed in a tournament with ECNL teams and got a couple of ties and a win, or this past season a 4th place SCCL team last year (spring 2023) with no roster changes ties an ECNL team in a tournament (fall 2023), or a SCCL team beating an ECRL team (fall 2023), those are just a few of the random games I am aware of, I am sure the list goes on and on. I would add, that I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion. I think what we all know if you have had a child playing at a high level here in ATL, the thing you notice the most is speed of play and technical ability, I would add after that intensity. The more kids you have playing at that level, then have the best kids from those teams get recruited to a NASA or Concord Plat. I agree with your points on driving kids hours vs the pay offs and the toll that takes on parents and kids alike. And it's also good to note, as you did, that some SCCL/ECRL teams at some age levels sometimes beat an ECNL or GAL team. What I categorically disagree with is your last statement. "... I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion"
Metro Atlanta youth soccer needs contraction and not expansion. This is specific to top level youth soccer and I'm probably speaking more towards the girls' side than the boys' side (and SCCL/ECRL is not top level youth soccer.) You can see this borne out in the fact that southern teams don't perform as well nationally compared to other regions, and this is singularly a product of lack of depth. It's very common for teams from our region to crush everyone regionally but struggle nationally (ie vs west coast teams.) As a basic example, if you have 10 - 12 ECNL/GAL clubs in Atlanta, and each team has say, maybe, 3 or 4 elite players, if you you contract those teams down to 8 teams, you would be increasing depth by adding multiple elite players to those 8 remaining teams (with the other non-elite players moving to ECRL,SCCL, etc with cascading effect through lower teams.) With expansion you would be removing those elite players and spreading them out to other teams, thus decreasing depth at the top level, while at the same time bringing up ECRL and SCCL players into an expanded top league and diluting the depth. So the expanded top league teams would have an even more difficult time competing nationally. I understand why you disagree, as I think my suggestion is counterintuitive and yours is more straightforward. I am assuming that training with better teammates and playing against better teams produces better players. In my example I am merely suggesting opening the pool up in at least one (maybe there are other areas) so more players get those things. This would theoretically produce a larger pool of better players. I then make a leap, that the top players will migrate to 2-3 teams so they get more exposure, etc. in national events. There is always the first question. What is the goal, to produce better players or produce better teams? Do better players produce better teams? It is too early for me to think through such deep subjects I would say, as a complete aside, I wish there was no ECRL or NAL so that more clubs had teams in SCCL. The pro/rel while flawed at times is far superior to the walled gardens our kids play in now.
|
|
|
Post by atlnoleg on Jan 18, 2024 9:43:52 GMT -5
I'm of the opinion there are too many clubs and too many teams that water down the overall level. But then I think there are too many kids playing club who should be playing rec--probably not a popular opinion. I know those lower level teams subsidize the top levels, so that will probably never change. The kids who really compete or want to compete at a higher level is probably just a few hundred in the whole Metro Atlanta area and could make up really strong top teams and second teams. But everyone wants a spot on an "elite" team so you just create more "elite" teams so this is what you get.
|
|
|
Post by mightydawg on Jan 18, 2024 12:31:24 GMT -5
I will be a contrarian. It is not as if the stronger players can just go to another local team, how are they going to make it to practice? Do you think a kid being in a carpool with practice four hours a night four nights a week is reasonable? Atlanta traffic sucks. Even if some kid was willing to do that we as adults should encourage them not to unless they are driving to ATL UTD or getting looks from the national team, and even then... They should add an ECNL/RL team in the Roswell / Woodstock area. Last year 3 of the 4 teams that played in the Georgia State Playoffs came from this area. A lot of talent in that area are stuck if they can't make NASA ECNL and/or if Concord West doesn't have an ECNL/RL team in their age group, which has a cascading effect through all levels. The only option is to drive, some kids on the east side of 400 can drive to AFU, some kids on the west side of 75 can drive to SSA, some kids make the drive north to UFA, and most kids make the hike to central. All of those options though suck for those kids as they are long drives. The kids that are left settle. If you look at this year or past years, it is why you get anomalous teams from this area - a few years ago SCCL was placed in a tournament with ECNL teams and got a couple of ties and a win, or this past season a 4th place SCCL team last year (spring 2023) with no roster changes ties an ECNL team in a tournament (fall 2023), or a SCCL team beating an ECRL team (fall 2023), those are just a few of the random games I am aware of, I am sure the list goes on and on. I would add, that I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion. I think what we all know if you have had a child playing at a high level here in ATL, the thing you notice the most is speed of play and technical ability, I would add after that intensity. The more kids you have playing at that level, then have the best kids from those teams get recruited to a NASA or Concord Plat. I agree with your points on driving kids hours vs the pay offs and the toll that takes on parents and kids alike. And it's also good to note, as you did, that some SCCL/ECRL teams at some age levels sometimes beat an ECNL or GAL team. What I categorically disagree with is your last statement. "... I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion"
Metro Atlanta youth soccer needs contraction and not expansion. This is specific to top level youth soccer and I'm probably speaking more towards the girls' side than the boys' side (and SCCL/ECRL is not top level youth soccer.) You can see this borne out in the fact that southern teams don't perform as well nationally compared to other regions, and this is singularly a product of lack of depth. It's very common for teams from our region to crush everyone regionally but struggle nationally (ie vs west coast teams.) As a basic example, if you have 10 - 12 ECNL/GAL clubs in Atlanta, and each team has say, maybe, 3 or 4 elite players, if you you contract those teams down to 8 teams, you would be increasing depth by adding multiple elite players to those 8 remaining teams (with the other non-elite players moving to ECRL,SCCL, etc with cascading effect through lower teams.) With expansion you would be removing those elite players and spreading them out to other teams, thus decreasing depth at the top level, while at the same time bringing up ECRL and SCCL players into an expanded top league and diluting the depth. So the expanded top league teams would have an even more difficult time competing nationally. There have been several national champs from the SE so not sure that I buy the argument that SE cannot compete with west coast and other areas of the country. If there is statistical relevant data to suggest otherwise, I would attribute more to the soccer calendar than anything else. Having club in the fall and HS in the spring is a huge disadvantage to SE teams v. teams that have HS in the fall and club in the spring when the tournament is played over the summer.
|
|
|
Post by futbolhero on Jan 18, 2024 13:09:00 GMT -5
I agree with your points on driving kids hours vs the pay offs and the toll that takes on parents and kids alike. And it's also good to note, as you did, that some SCCL/ECRL teams at some age levels sometimes beat an ECNL or GAL team. What I categorically disagree with is your last statement. "... I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion"
Metro Atlanta youth soccer needs contraction and not expansion. This is specific to top level youth soccer and I'm probably speaking more towards the girls' side than the boys' side (and SCCL/ECRL is not top level youth soccer.) You can see this borne out in the fact that southern teams don't perform as well nationally compared to other regions, and this is singularly a product of lack of depth. It's very common for teams from our region to crush everyone regionally but struggle nationally (ie vs west coast teams.) As a basic example, if you have 10 - 12 ECNL/GAL clubs in Atlanta, and each team has say, maybe, 3 or 4 elite players, if you you contract those teams down to 8 teams, you would be increasing depth by adding multiple elite players to those 8 remaining teams (with the other non-elite players moving to ECRL,SCCL, etc with cascading effect through lower teams.) With expansion you would be removing those elite players and spreading them out to other teams, thus decreasing depth at the top level, while at the same time bringing up ECRL and SCCL players into an expanded top league and diluting the depth. So the expanded top league teams would have an even more difficult time competing nationally. There have been several national champs from the SE so not sure that I buy the argument that SE cannot compete with west coast and other areas of the country. If there is statistical relevant data to suggest otherwise, I would attribute more to the soccer calendar than anything else. Having club in the fall and HS in the spring is a huge disadvantage to SE teams v. teams that have HS in the fall and club in the spring when the tournament is played over the summer. I could see that argument. Teams here qualify for nationals in January with very little time together before nationals in June be the ones that start in January and play together and practice all the way up to nationals in June.
|
|
|
Post by soccerlegacy on Jan 18, 2024 13:10:39 GMT -5
There have been several national champs from the SE so not sure that I buy the argument that SE cannot compete with west coast and other areas of the country. If there is statistical relevant data to suggest otherwise, I would attribute more to the soccer calendar than anything else. Having club in the fall and HS in the spring is a huge disadvantage to SE teams v. teams that have HS in the fall and club in the spring when the tournament is played over the summer. Exactly. I've actually been very impressed by the soccer prowess shown from the southeastern teams, and in particular, Metro Atlanta. Concorde and Tophat are often recognized nationally as some of the top performing clubs in National Championship/Showcases, as well as, on website rankings like Soccerwire.com. UFA and GSA are also up there, all be it, to a slightly lesser degree. Although, UFA has made great strides and is poised to be along side CF and TH and will probably surpass TH soon enough (if they haven't already), while giving CF a run for their money (No pun intended, ).
|
|
|
Post by atlantagray on Jan 18, 2024 13:19:24 GMT -5
I agree with your points on driving kids hours vs the pay offs and the toll that takes on parents and kids alike. And it's also good to note, as you did, that some SCCL/ECRL teams at some age levels sometimes beat an ECNL or GAL team. What I categorically disagree with is your last statement. "... I believe you get better teams performing nationally by encouraging expansion"
Metro Atlanta youth soccer needs contraction and not expansion. This is specific to top level youth soccer and I'm probably speaking more towards the girls' side than the boys' side (and SCCL/ECRL is not top level youth soccer.) You can see this borne out in the fact that southern teams don't perform as well nationally compared to other regions, and this is singularly a product of lack of depth. It's very common for teams from our region to crush everyone regionally but struggle nationally (ie vs west coast teams.) As a basic example, if you have 10 - 12 ECNL/GAL clubs in Atlanta, and each team has say, maybe, 3 or 4 elite players, if you you contract those teams down to 8 teams, you would be increasing depth by adding multiple elite players to those 8 remaining teams (with the other non-elite players moving to ECRL,SCCL, etc with cascading effect through lower teams.) With expansion you would be removing those elite players and spreading them out to other teams, thus decreasing depth at the top level, while at the same time bringing up ECRL and SCCL players into an expanded top league and diluting the depth. So the expanded top league teams would have an even more difficult time competing nationally. There have been several national champs from the SE so not sure that I buy the argument that SE cannot compete with west coast and other areas of the country. If there is statistical relevant data to suggest otherwise, I would attribute more to the soccer calendar than anything else. Having club in the fall and HS in the spring is a huge disadvantage to SE teams v. teams that have HS in the fall and club in the spring when the tournament is played over the summer. SE Region teams sometimes win national championships. And SCCL and ECRL teams sometimes beat GAL and ECNL teams. There was not a single SE Region team who made it to ECNL nationals last year. Do you buy that?
|
|
|
Post by datrain on Jan 18, 2024 13:20:32 GMT -5
Atlanta teams could compete better if they hired coaches that were actually quality talent evaluators. Having moved here from NY years ago and having had two sons that played DA, the biggest difference on the boys side between Atlanta and the Northeast clubs (DC through Boston) is that the the top northern clubs really focus on technical ability and strategic on field vision rather than raw athleticism. The NE teams have plenty of smaller technical players....they don't have to have sprinter speed or NBA/NFL size to succeed. The top NYCFC and Union kids are not huge....but you won't find any Maximo Carizzo's, Zidane Yanez's or Gio Reyna's here....they would all be kicked to the curb as "too small"
|
|