|
Post by oraclesfriend on May 15, 2022 11:25:59 GMT -5
Nope. Plays the parent politics game now. Oh no, he is not loyal to legacy players to a fault. He recruits from outside the club. His 2011 team does not need any new kids but I would be shocked if he has not spoken to 08 players around metro Atlanta. That 08 team is the weakest team that UFA has in ECNL. He will be doing what he can to make it better with outside players. Recruitment is part of the game at all clubs including UFA. Speaking of loyalty is oxymoron as there is none on both sides. AW is no different, but he is a great coach IMHO.[/quote] He is a strong coach. I was just trying to dispell the notion that he is loyal to a fault. He does have a few favorites but they are all very high quality kids everyone would want. But I agree that recruiting is normal and he is not unusual in that respect.
|
|
|
Post by trea30260 on May 15, 2022 13:43:15 GMT -5
Nope. Plays the parent politics game now.[/quote] Really, because I heard that he is loyal to UFA Legacy players to a fault. This seems to scare alot of people away from playing for him. I know his 2011 team is the best in the state. His ECNL team seems as if their are only a handful of players that could make another ECNL/GAL team in metro Atlanta. It's pretty impressive what he's done with that group. But, I'm just looking from the outside. I could be wrong[/quote] They are not top U11 team in Ga, lost to Tophat 6-1. Not that strong IJS
|
|
|
Post by oraclesfriend on May 15, 2022 13:58:07 GMT -5
Nope. Plays the parent politics game now. Really, because I heard that he is loyal to UFA Legacy players to a fault. This seems to scare alot of people away from playing for him. I know his 2011 team is the best in the state. His ECNL team seems as if their are only a handful of players that could make another ECNL/GAL team in metro Atlanta. It's pretty impressive what he's done with that group. But, I'm just looking from the outside. I could be wrong[/quote] They are not top U11 team in Ga, lost to Tophat 6-1. Not that strong IJS[/quote] I don't think he plays politics. That has not been what I have seen. As for the 2011 team they have several really stellar players but I don't think they are as deep as some teams. Did not see the game vs Tophat. Which Tophat team was it? Sometimes they play a "tournament team " where they take their best from all locations and make a team. Regardless he develops players well. He recruits well. He is an interesting person.
|
|
|
Post by trea30260 on May 15, 2022 14:22:48 GMT -5
Nope. Plays the parent politics game now. Really, because I heard that he is loyal to UFA Legacy players to a fault. This seems to scare alot of people away from playing for him. I know his 2011 team is the best in the state. His ECNL team seems as if their are only a handful of players that could make another ECNL/GAL team in metro Atlanta. It's pretty impressive what he's done with that group. But, I'm just looking from the outside. I could be wrong They are not top U11 team in Ga, lost to Tophat 6-1. Not that strong IJS[/quote] I don't think he plays politics. That has not been what I have seen. As for the 2011 team they have several really stellar players but I don't think they are as deep as some teams. Did not see the game vs Tophat. Which Tophat team was it? Sometimes they play a "tournament team " where they take their best from all locations and make a team. Regardless he develops players well. He recruits well. He is an interesting person. [/quote] They played Buckhead gold and 2 of top 4 players were out. Not that good hence why they are recruiting hard. Politics are played and loyalty is given to homegrowns, it’s the UFA way.
|
|
|
Post by atlsoccer123 on May 15, 2022 14:35:42 GMT -5
Nope. Plays the parent politics game now. Really, because I heard that he is loyal to UFA Legacy players to a fault. This seems to scare alot of people away from playing for him. I know his 2011 team is the best in the state. His ECNL team seems as if their are only a handful of players that could make another ECNL/GAL team in metro Atlanta. It's pretty impressive what he's done with that group. But, I'm just looking from the outside. I could be wrong I don't think he plays politics. That has not been what I have seen. Regardless he develops players well. He recruits well. He is an interesting person. [/quote] I haven't heard that he is loyal to legacy players. All of that doesn't matter - he has to bring in new players to fill the gaps. I don't think he has many (any) legacy players left on the older girls team. I've heard he does develop and recruit well.
|
|
|
Post by soccer888 on May 17, 2022 6:44:07 GMT -5
Explain to me why coaches threaten and get really angry when players investigate other clubs, but they are out there recruiting to get players to visit their club? Double standards galore this time of year with a system that is dishonest and abusive. Why can't tryouts be.... tryouts? Teams are already 98% made and it's all just ridiculous. None of it is real.
Thank you for the space to rant. When you guys, paying customers, are ready to start a soccer revolution against these clubs, count us in
|
|
|
Post by unitedwestand on May 17, 2022 7:27:54 GMT -5
Explain to me why coaches threaten and get really angry when players investigate other clubs, but they are out there recruiting to get players to visit their club? Double standards galore this time of year with a system that is dishonest and abusive. Why can't tryouts be.... tryouts? Teams are already 98% made and it's all just ridiculous. None of it is real. Thank you for the space to rant. When you guys, paying customers, are ready to start a soccer revolution against these clubs, count us in Get on board it's already begun! Keep watching 👀 parents are taking their power back this tryout season.
|
|
|
Post by soccer888 on May 17, 2022 7:32:18 GMT -5
Explain to me why coaches threaten and get really angry when players investigate other clubs, but they are out there recruiting to get players to visit their club? Double standards galore this time of year with a system that is dishonest and abusive. Why can't tryouts be.... tryouts? Teams are already 98% made and it's all just ridiculous. None of it is real. Thank you for the space to rant. When you guys, paying customers, are ready to start a soccer revolution against these clubs, count us in Get on board it's already begun! Keep watching 👀 parents are taking their power back this tryout season. Where's my invite?
|
|
|
Post by cornerkick on May 17, 2022 8:32:36 GMT -5
Explain to me why coaches threaten and get really angry when players investigate other clubs, but they are out there recruiting to get players to visit their club? Double standards galore this time of year with a system that is dishonest and abusive. Why can't tryouts be.... tryouts? Teams are already 98% made and it's all just ridiculous. None of it is real. Thank you for the space to rant. When you guys, paying customers, are ready to start a soccer revolution against these clubs, count us in Knowing this double standard, why do parents run to this forum to broadcast players from other clubs that show up at another clubs ID camp?
|
|
|
Post by oraclesfriend on May 17, 2022 8:43:47 GMT -5
Explain to me why coaches threaten and get really angry when players investigate other clubs, but they are out there recruiting to get players to visit their club? Double standards galore this time of year with a system that is dishonest and abusive. Why can't tryouts be.... tryouts? Teams are already 98% made and it's all just ridiculous. None of it is real. Thank you for the space to rant. When you guys, paying customers, are ready to start a soccer revolution against these clubs, count us in Knowing this double standard, why do parents run to this forum to broadcast players from other clubs that show up at another clubs ID camp? Do they? I have not seen names of players or even initials? Sometimes someone will day their own kid is looking or a group from another club without names. I have rarely ever seen references to players. Even if there was one it would be uncool for anyone to then tell their coach. Besides a lot of kids go to ID camps to experience playing with different kids and just getting more touches to get ready. It does not always mean they are looking.
|
|
|
Post by soccer888 on May 17, 2022 10:03:30 GMT -5
Explain to me why coaches threaten and get really angry when players investigate other clubs, but they are out there recruiting to get players to visit their club? Double standards galore this time of year with a system that is dishonest and abusive. Why can't tryouts be.... tryouts? Teams are already 98% made and it's all just ridiculous. None of it is real. Thank you for the space to rant. When you guys, paying customers, are ready to start a soccer revolution against these clubs, count us in Knowing this double standard, why do parents run to this forum to broadcast players from other clubs that show up at another clubs ID camp? I have never seen anyone do this. I've been a lurker on here for 3 years
|
|
|
Post by cornerkick on May 17, 2022 10:26:01 GMT -5
Knowing this double standard, why do parents run to this forum to broadcast players from other clubs that show up at another clubs ID camp? Do they? I have not seen names of players or even initials? Sometimes someone will day their own kid is looking or a group from another club without names. I have rarely ever seen references to players. Even if there was one it would be uncool for anyone to then tell their coach. Besides a lot of kids go to ID camps to experience playing with different kids and just getting more touches to get ready. It does not always mean they are looking. Not individual players, but I've seen alot of mentions about players from which clubs were seen at so-and-so's ID camp. Like this. "I wonder how many CF boys were at that ID camp? Two days before a big NASA-CF Platinum Saturday slate? So CF parents, ask yourselves who missed practice last night? Ramifications?" "Lots of girls all ages at the GSA ID tonight. Saw some Concorde and TH. Not in the droves though." "There were several Tophat kids as well. And no one was missing from the current UFA ECNL team - everyone was there."
|
|
|
Post by unitedwestand on May 17, 2022 11:37:43 GMT -5
Do they? I have not seen names of players or even initials? Sometimes someone will day their own kid is looking or a group from another club without names. I have rarely ever seen references to players. Even if there was one it would be uncool for anyone to then tell their coach. Besides a lot of kids go to ID camps to experience playing with different kids and just getting more touches to get ready. It does not always mean they are looking. Not individual players, but I've seen alot of mentions about players from which clubs were seen at so-and-so's ID camp. Like this. "I wonder how many CF boys were at that ID camp? Two days before a big NASA-CF Platinum Saturday slate? So CF parents, ask yourselves who missed practice last night? Ramifications?" "Lots of girls all ages at the GSA ID tonight. Saw some Concorde and TH. Not in the droves though." "There were several Tophat kids as well. And no one was missing from the current UFA ECNL team - everyone was there." I don't see anything wrong with that? What's the issue? Honestly, if you go to another ID camp then chances are your current club already knows before you even left. The soccer community in Metro Atlanta is very small.
|
|
|
Post by Soccerhouse on May 17, 2022 11:43:19 GMT -5
The question is should you tell your coach your going to another ID session? or will it be held against you?
|
|
|
Post by atlsoccer123 on May 17, 2022 11:46:04 GMT -5
Explain to me why coaches threaten and get really angry when players investigate other clubs, but they are out there recruiting to get players to visit their club? Double standards galore this time of year with a system that is dishonest and abusive. Why can't tryouts be.... tryouts? Teams are already 98% made and it's all just ridiculous. None of it is real. Thank you for the space to rant. When you guys, paying customers, are ready to start a soccer revolution against these clubs, count us in Knowing this double standard, why do parents run to this forum to broadcast players from other clubs that show up at another clubs ID camp? It's called a lack of transparency (both club & player). And parent politics.
|
|
|
Post by atlsoccer123 on May 17, 2022 11:52:37 GMT -5
The question is should you tell your coach your going to another ID session? or will it be held against you? I think so. But it really depends on the coach (if it will be held against you).
|
|
|
Post by DunwoodySoccerDad on May 17, 2022 11:59:18 GMT -5
The question is should you tell your coach your going to another ID session? or will it be held against you? I think so. But it really depends on the coach (if it will be held against you). Agreed - I think it really depends on the situation. Some are more complicated than others.
|
|
|
Post by rifle on May 17, 2022 11:59:54 GMT -5
I think this suggestion that a coach favors “homegrown” players (from their own academy) is excellent. Hardly a reason to dislike a coach - the opposite in fact.
|
|
|
Post by DunwoodySoccerDad on May 17, 2022 12:11:45 GMT -5
I think this suggestion that a coach favors “homegrown” players (from their own academy) is excellent. Hardly a reason to dislike a coach - the opposite in fact. They also tend to favor a returning player over a new player of similar or slightly better ability. I know parents watching tryouts when their kid is at a new club can get frustrated with the team they're placed on, but I think the great majority of the time the coach simply doesn't want to drop a returning player for a new player unless that new player is a clear upgrade and makes the team better. Granted, there may be other mitigating circumstances (like behavior on or off the field) that change that general rule, but that's what I've observed over the years.
|
|
|
Post by mamadona on May 17, 2022 12:17:46 GMT -5
I think this suggestion that a coach favors “homegrown” players (from their own academy) is excellent. Hardly a reason to dislike a coach - the opposite in fact. They also tend to favor a returning player over a new player of similar or slightly better ability. I know parents watching tryouts when their kid is at a new club can get frustrated with the team they're placed on, but I think the great majority of the time the coach simply doesn't want to drop a returning player for a new player unless that new player is a clear upgrade and makes the team better. Granted, there may be other mitigating circumstances (like behavior on or off the field) that change that general rule, but that's what I've observed over the years. That’s good. It’s also hard to tell just from tryouts how good someone really is in games. They might not be as good as they seemed.
|
|
|
Post by DunwoodySoccerDad on May 17, 2022 12:28:50 GMT -5
They also tend to favor a returning player over a new player of similar or slightly better ability. I know parents watching tryouts when their kid is at a new club can get frustrated with the team they're placed on, but I think the great majority of the time the coach simply doesn't want to drop a returning player for a new player unless that new player is a clear upgrade and makes the team better. Granted, there may be other mitigating circumstances (like behavior on or off the field) that change that general rule, but that's what I've observed over the years. That’s good. It’s also hard to tell just from tryouts how good someone really is in games. They might not be as good as they seemed. Exactly right - we're watching these returning players at tryouts and only seeing a fraction of what the coach has seen from them in practices & games. Some kids' best qualities may not show up in a tryout setting.
|
|
|
Post by mamadona on May 17, 2022 12:30:57 GMT -5
That’s good. It’s also hard to tell just from tryouts how good someone really is in games. They might not be as good as they seemed. Exactly right - we're watching these returning players at tryouts and only seeing a fraction of what the coach has seen from them in practices & games. Some kids' best qualities may not show up in a tryout setting. Yeah that too. I meant the opposite. Someone seems really good at tryouts but then disappoints in games.
|
|
|
Post by bolo on May 17, 2022 13:04:19 GMT -5
I think this suggestion that a coach favors “homegrown” players (from their own academy) is excellent. Hardly a reason to dislike a coach - the opposite in fact. They also tend to favor a returning player over a new player of similar or slightly better ability. I know parents watching tryouts when their kid is at a new club can get frustrated with the team they're placed on, but I think the great majority of the time the coach simply doesn't want to drop a returning player for a new player unless that new player is a clear upgrade and makes the team better. Granted, there may be other mitigating circumstances (like behavior on or off the field) that change that general rule, but that's what I've observed over the years. I don't know- you also see coaches that fall in love with the "shiny new toy" from another club, especially if they perceive that they're "poaching" that kid from said club. And especially if the club they're coming from is either generally perceived to be a "better" club or is considered a rival club of the one they're coming to. It can definitely cut both ways.
|
|
|
Post by DunwoodySoccerDad on May 17, 2022 13:09:49 GMT -5
They also tend to favor a returning player over a new player of similar or slightly better ability. I know parents watching tryouts when their kid is at a new club can get frustrated with the team they're placed on, but I think the great majority of the time the coach simply doesn't want to drop a returning player for a new player unless that new player is a clear upgrade and makes the team better. Granted, there may be other mitigating circumstances (like behavior on or off the field) that change that general rule, but that's what I've observed over the years. I don't know- you also see coaches that fall in love with the "shiny new toy" from another club, especially if they perceive that they're "poaching" that kid from said club. And especially if the club they're coming from is either generally perceived to be a "better" club or is considered a rival club of the one they're coming to. It can definitely cut both ways. I hear this a lot and yet I haven't really seen it myself. Not saying it doesn't go on, just that I don't think it occurs as often as many suggest. If that shiny new toy gets dropped to the team below the following year, then yeah you probably had a situation where the poached kid was not as good as the coach thought/hoped. We just don't often hear about how that kid turned out and how the team performed compared to the prior year. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
Post by bolo on May 17, 2022 13:14:38 GMT -5
I don't know- you also see coaches that fall in love with the "shiny new toy" from another club, especially if they perceive that they're "poaching" that kid from said club. And especially if the club they're coming from is either generally perceived to be a "better" club or is considered a rival club of the one they're coming to. It can definitely cut both ways. I hear this a lot and yet I haven't really seen it myself. Not saying it doesn't go on, just that I don't think it occurs as often as many suggest. If that shiny new toy gets dropped to the team below the following year, then yeah you probably had a situation where the poached kid was not as good as the coach thought/hoped. We just don't often hear about how that kid turned out and how the team performed compared to the prior year. Just my 2 cents. Yeah, I'm not saying it always happens, or happens more frequently than the opposite scenario that you described (loyalty to current club players), but I have seen it happen. Especially if the player that's coming in has the right letters behind their name. If a player is coming from an ECNL team to try to make ECNL at a different club, for example, it's almost like instant validation and earns them the benefit of the doubt, even if that player might not be as strong as their former team affiliation might indicate.
|
|
|
Post by DunwoodySoccerDad on May 17, 2022 13:19:59 GMT -5
I hear this a lot and yet I haven't really seen it myself. Not saying it doesn't go on, just that I don't think it occurs as often as many suggest. If that shiny new toy gets dropped to the team below the following year, then yeah you probably had a situation where the poached kid was not as good as the coach thought/hoped. We just don't often hear about how that kid turned out and how the team performed compared to the prior year. Just my 2 cents. Yeah, I'm not saying it always happens, or happens more frequently than the opposite scenario that you described (loyalty to current club players), but I have seen it happen. Especially if the player that's coming in has the right letters behind their name. If a player is coming from an ECNL team to try to make ECNL at a different club, for example, it's almost like instant validation and earns them the benefit of the doubt, even if that player might not be as strong as their former team affiliation might indicate. True - simply playing ECNL in the previous year at a different club gives that player instant credibility at a new club and it may not be warranted. A good coach would/should ask the player or their parents about the circumstances of why they're leaving their current club and determine if it's related to the likelihood they were getting dropped.
|
|
|
Post by mightydawg on May 17, 2022 13:27:38 GMT -5
I think this suggestion that a coach favors “homegrown” players (from their own academy) is excellent. Hardly a reason to dislike a coach - the opposite in fact. They also tend to favor a returning player over a new player of similar or slightly better ability. I know parents watching tryouts when their kid is at a new club can get frustrated with the team they're placed on, but I think the great majority of the time the coach simply doesn't want to drop a returning player for a new player unless that new player is a clear upgrade and makes the team better. Granted, there may be other mitigating circumstances (like behavior on or off the field) that change that general rule, but that's what I've observed over the years. That is the way that it should be. A returning player should have to clearly lose their position to a new player. However, I have very rarely, if ever, seen it that way. Giving the coach the full benefit of the doubt, coaches know the warts of the returning players but not the shiny new object. With the shiny new object, they see a flash and believe that with their coaching they can turn the flashes into a constant shine. The cynical view and considering the business of soccer, coaches will typically take the new kid because they believe that a returning player is less likely to leave the club if the player drops to a lower team and that the new kid is less likely to join the club at a lower team. More players=more money.
|
|
|
Post by youthsoccerdad on May 18, 2022 12:04:23 GMT -5
Five Things I Have Learned About ID Sessions with multiple kids, specifically regarding ECNL/RL teams -
1. Showing up "unannounced" at an ID session is a futile exercise in frustration for kids and parents alike. 2. Trying to make a team that finished 1st or 2nd in their division is generally a futile exercise for almost any player unless they are a baller with connections. 3. If your kid is at SCCL or ECRL and you want to move up at your club, you should have already had conversations with coaches prior to ID sessions. 4. High school soccer creates an opportunity for upward mobility. You need to be a baller for it to matter, but your kid gets a fresh start and a fair chance against "elite" players. 5. By U15, players are recruiting as much as coaches. If your kid knows a kid that is on the team, have your kid talk to them. This connection generally happens in high school soccer.
Lastly don't be a victim.
- Not sure where your kid stands, MOST parents never ask. - Want your kid to move to a new club, MOST parents never reach out prior. - Everyone on the sideline says your kid is great? They always do to both kids that are great and kids that aren't great. It's called being nice. Stop internalizing it. - The ~top 20% of whatever league is lower than the one you want to join are as good if not better than the bottom 20% above them. Bohoo, that is life. Life is not fair. - High school soccer is more fun than a club for 80+% of kids. You just have to make the journey to HS then you can't stop worrying about club so much.
That is my feedback, I'm sure there are some outliers or examples you may find is not true. But this would be the case of a parent with kids that are "good" who has made every mistake listed above.
|
|
|
Post by mightydawg on May 18, 2022 12:46:23 GMT -5
What he is saying is that if you are trying to make ECNL, for example, the top 20% of ECNL Regional league (1 level below where you want to be) are as good as if not better than the bottom 20% of ECNL teams (level that you want to be).
|
|
|
Post by bolo on May 18, 2022 13:23:37 GMT -5
What he is saying is that if you are trying to make ECNL, for example, the top 20% of ECNL Regional league (1 level below where you want to be) are as good as if not better than the bottom 20% of ECNL teams (level that you want to be). Agree with this. Also in the same vein, I would venture to say that the top 30-40% of any given ECRL roster is basically interchangeable with the bottom 30-40% of the ECNL roster at that same club, with some exceptions. Same with SCCL to ECRL, etc.
|
|